But in the interests of expediently resolving th… RyanSmithAT: The actual, underlying issue appears to be a Chrome rendering bug.RyanSmithAT: Is it still occurring? Or has our fix stopped it for you?.RyanSmithAT: RT AMD Software Adrenalin Edition 23.2.1 is now available with updates to the RX 6000 and RX 7000 series.ganeshts: Claimed perf numbers are better than all DRAMless Gen 4 SSD currently in the market, and essen….RyanSmithAT: These early reviews of the PSVR2 have me increasingly tempted to pick one up.gavbon86: 100%,or waking up three days later not knowing who or where he is.gavbon86: He's two years older than Luis ORTIZ, whatcha talking about Willis □.gavbon86: Alright, calm down Dr Zhuvago.gavbon86: Lara Warrington 3, then Bronco can knock Space Raider into the shadow realm.If you'd like to see more of this sort of testing, let us know in the comments section. If you're one of many already using IE8, despite detractors it looks to be a good balance of features, performance, and battery life.įinally, we're always open for suggestions on other tests you might like to see us run. Based on user statistics, however, the most popular browsers are already the best choices for battery life, so change may not even be necessary. If you're not set on using a specific browser, battery life might be enough of a consideration to get you to try something new, but most users will probably be more concerned with features and compatibility. We suspect that Safari 4 does better under OS X, however, so the poor Windows result probably won't matter to most Safari users. Safari is at the back, by a large margin on all three test notebooks. Opera in general - version 9 or 10 - looks like it doesn't do as well as the other major browsers. Opera 10 Beta 3 didn't do as well as Opera 9.6.4, and in a couple quick tests it doesn't appear that the final release of Opera 10 changes the situation at all. Overall, Internet Explorer and Firefox + AdBlock consistently place near the top, along with Chrome. Intel's platform doesn't show quite as much difference between browsers, but you could still get 5% more battery life. The AMD platform showed the most differentiation between browsers, so a switch might net you 10% or more battery life. We expected to see the largest difference on netbooks, where we thought the CPU and limited memory would influence the results instead the opposite was true, where our netbook had nearly identical battery life with every browser we tested other than Safari 4. Outside of Safari 4, which was clearly the worst browser choice for battery life under Windows, the major browsers offer similar battery life.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |